The year 2020 has been shaped by Covid-19. The pandemic has revealed some of our main economic flaws, such as global overconsumption of natural resources, lifestyle of fast-consumption, and increasing social injustice. However, it has also reminded us of the critical role entrepreneurs play in initiating and facilitating economic activity. That is why, we currently need – more than ever – impact entrepreneurs that strive to build up new ventures that could contribute to solving some of our key economic flaws. New ventures that make money while at the same time seeking to generate long-lasting impact.
What is impact entrepreneurship about?
To better understand the meaning behind impact entrepreneurship, we need to have a closer look at the word impact itself. Usually, impact is used to describe ‘a marked effect or influence’ on another person. In the case of impact entrepreneurship, we perceive that those new ventures not only focus on generating profit but also concentrate on creating a specific effect, in other words, a positive change towards the society and/or the environment.
Every entrepreneur and every business creates a positive as well as a negative impact on its stakeholders simply by operating their business. The difference is that impact entrepreneurs are aware of all the possible impacts, and they seek to reduce as much as possible negative ones while fostering positive effects. Hence, those new businesses are supposed to be more ethical and more transparent as they try to contribute to transforming our economic systems into sustainable ones that are ready for the future.
Yet in recent years, we have created even more labels to define emerging types of entrepreneurship that are not solely focused on generating profit. For instance, in 2012, Filipe Santos introduced the term social entrepreneurship, which is used to describe entrepreneurs who seek to solve ‘neglected problems’ with ‘sustainable solutions. Followed by environmental entrepreneurship, hybrid entrepreneurship as well as sustainable entrepreneurship.
It’s surprising that we have created literally a jungle of types of entrepreneurs and ventures, especially because, in the end, they have one common goal: blending economic goals with fairness and mindfulness in order to create a positive impact on the society and/or environment.
Is impact entrepreneurship something new?
We can look at some of the most successful cases of the past, such as Muhammad Yunus, who founded the Grameen Bank and earned the 2006 Nobel Peace Prize. In this case, we have perceived his impact and social-orientation as a rather new phenomenon. Thus, we have defined him as a specific type of entrepreneur, a social entrepreneur.
That said, we believe that there might be at least two primary reasons why impact entrepreneurship should not be perceived as something new. But rather, as something that we may have unlearned and are now starting to rediscover.
Reason 1: Commitment to strengthening the community
One important element of impact entrepreneurship is the positive effect that businesses create on the society and the local community in which they are embedded. Especially in Europe, we can find salient cases in which firms have meticulously considered the integration of the local community in their business objectives. Let’s take, for instance, the Italian case of Marzotto Group. Founded in 1836 as ‘Lanificio Luigi Marzotto & Figli’, the group still manufactures today woolen cotton yarns for clothing (another example: Olivetti – a renowned designer of typewriters). Luigi Marzotto founded the firm in a small village called Valdagno which they have transformed into a lively small city. Over the years, they have created apartments, schools, kindergartens, and orchestras to grow the firm together with the community in which they are located. By doing so, we can see that the Marzotto Group has not only focused on increasing their annual profit but also on strengthening the community by sharing their success.
Reason 2: Power to build up formal institutions
In order to illuminate the power of entrepreneurs to build up formal institutions, we can look at entrepreneurs who are located in an extreme context such as hostile environments. Those environments are generally shaped by severe institutional voids, lack of governmental support, and high corruption rates. For example, Joseph Nkandu founded NUCAFE in Uganda in 1999 in order to establish a national union of coffee agribusiness. To succeed in his mission to build up a market-driven system of coffee farmers and to strengthen their position in the market, he needed to closely partner with the local government. By doing so, they were able to improve legal regulations and taxes. Today, NUCAFE has become a network of 155 associations that impacts over 600,000 farmers across Uganda.
Another example in which we can see the power of entrepreneurs is the blockchain sector in Kenya. Entrepreneurs such as Felix Macharia and Daniel Kimotho (Co-founders of Kotani Pay) actively support the local government in developing a report for new ventures using blockchain applications. Like in these examples, we argue that entrepreneurs have the role of micro institutional agents that support building up new formal institutions in order to pursue their business goals. We can also assume that this is not the first time in which entrepreneurs were surrounded by severe institutional voids and decided to use their power to address them.
So, what?
Impact entrepreneurship does not seem to be a new trend or a new phenomenon but a way of doing business that we already know from our history. In the previous decades, we might have lost sight of the relevance of considering the impact that we create due to our business. It will be interesting to see if the future welcomes a new generation of entrepreneurs that go back to those values and that strive for the generation of impact. And maybe it could make more sense to find a term for entrepreneurs that purely strive for profit generation, instead of finding new terms for entrepreneurs that focus on multiple goals.
Feature photo by Clark Tibbs on Unsplash.
License and Republishing
The Choice - Republishing rules
We publish under a Creative Commons license with the following characteristics Attribution/Sharealike.
-
You may not make any changes to the articles published on our site, except for dates, locations (according to the news, if necessary), and your editorial policy. The content must be reproduced and represented by the licensee as published by The Choice, without any cuts, additions, insertions, reductions, alterations or any other modifications.
If changes are planned in the text, they must be made in agreement with the author before publication. - Please make sure to cite the authors of the articles, ideally at the beginning of your republication.
- It is mandatory to cite The Choice and include a link to its homepage or the URL of thearticle. Insertion of The Choice’s logo is highly recommended.
- The sale of our articles in a separate way, in their entirety or in extracts, is not allowed , but you can publish them on pages including advertisements.
-
Please request permission before republishing any of the images or pictures contained in our articles. Some of them are not available for republishing without authorization and payment. Please check the terms available in the image caption.
However, it is possible to remove images or pictures used by The Choice or replace them with your own. - Systematic and/or complete republication of the articles and content available on The Choice is prohibited.
- Republishing The Choice articles on a site whose access is entirely available by payment or by subscription is prohibited.
- For websites where access to digital content is restricted by a paywall, republication of The Choice articles, in their entirety, must be on the open access portion of those sites.
- The Choice reserves the right to enter into separate written agreements for the republication of its articles, under the non-exclusive Creative Commons licenses and with the permission of the authors. Please contact The Choice if you are interested at contact@the-choice.org.
Individual cases
Extracts: It is recommended that after republishing the first few lines or a paragraph of an article, you indicate "The entire article is available on ESCP’s media, The Choice" with a link to the article.
Citations: Citations of articles written by authors from The Choice should include a link to the URL of the authors’ article.
Translations: Translations may be considered modifications under The Choice's Creative Commons license, therefore these are not permitted without the approval of the article's author.
Modifications: Modifications are not permitted under the Creative Commons license of The Choice. However, authors may be contacted for authorization, prior to any publication, where a modification is planned. Without express consent, The Choice is not bound by any changes made to its content when republished.
Authorized connections / copyright assignment forms: Their use is not necessary as long as the republishing rules of this article are respected.
Print: The Choice articles can be republished according to the rules mentioned above, without the need to include the view counter and links in a printed version.
If you choose this option, please send an image of the republished article to The Choice team so that the author can review it.
Podcasts and videos: Videos and podcasts whose copyrights belong to The Choice are also under a Creative Commons license. Therefore, the same republishing rules apply to them.
