You have probably already witnessed this particularly tricky situation: your company has launched a costly project amid a flurry of sweeping announcements, it has officially made it part of the strategy and invested considerable resources and energy but unfortunately, after a while, it becomes clear that the project is a failure. The expected results are not achieved and the operation’s financial equation is turning dangerously negative. The rational thing to do would be to abandon the project, salvage what can still be used elsewhere, and change plans accordingly.
However, all too often decision-makers are reluctant to change course: the project must be given time to prove its worth, it would be premature to kill it off before it has had a chance to really take off, and above all, if we stop now, everything we have invested will have been wasted, whereas pressing on is the only hope we have of proving that we were right. To try to turn things around, some companies will invest even more! The result is that the company continues the project not because it has succeeded, but because it has failed…
“Few things are more damaging to a decision-maker’s reputation than publicly reneging on a decision.”
Conceptualised by University of California, Berkeley Professor Barry Staw, this dangerous phenomenon called escalation of commitment can wreak havoc in many organisations.
Few things are more damaging to a decision-maker’s reputation than publicly reneging on a decision. Furthermore, keeping people onside when you change your mind is often riskier than standing your ground. Psychologically, it is more rewarding to keep running towards a wall, telling yourself that you will eventually break through it, than to be seen as an inconsistent and potentially untrustworthy weathervane.
Some of the most famous examples of escalation of commitment include the Shoreham nuclear power plant in New York state, which operated for less than four years after 11 years of construction, or movie Cleopatra – which ended up costing 22 times its original $2 million budget.
What can you do to avoid escalation of commitment? Paradoxically, one attractive solution is to make another commitment: to stop if you fail. More specifically, before embarking on any project, you should ensure that you state publicly what the maximum acceptable loss – a military euphemism also known as acceptable damage or acceptable casualties – is.
By setting an upper limit on the risk you are willing to accept, and by being public about it, you limit the likelihood of being accused of inconsistency. It is important not to let yourself get caught up in your own involvement in the project, and to be able to stick to this second commitment to abandon it once a certain limit has been reached.
In short, if you stick to the maximum acceptable loss you have set, you protect yourself from drifting away from your commitment: before making any major decision, determine how far you can go.
This was previously published in French by Xerfi Canal.
This post gives the views of its author, not the position of ESCP Business School.
License and Republishing
The Choice - Republishing rules
We publish under a Creative Commons license with the following characteristics Attribution/Sharealike.
- You may not make any changes to the articles published on our site, except for dates, locations (according to the news, if necessary), and your editorial policy. The content must be reproduced and represented by the licensee as published by The Choice, without any cuts, additions, insertions, reductions, alterations or any other modifications.If changes are planned in the text, they must be made in agreement with the author before publication.
- Please make sure to cite the authors of the articles, ideally at the beginning of your republication.
- It is mandatory to cite The Choice and include a link to its homepage or the URL of thearticle. Insertion of The Choice’s logo is highly recommended.
- The sale of our articles in a separate way, in their entirety or in extracts, is not allowed , but you can publish them on pages including advertisements.
- Please request permission before republishing any of the images or pictures contained in our articles. Some of them are not available for republishing without authorization and payment. Please check the terms available in the image caption. However, it is possible to remove images or pictures used by The Choice or replace them with your own.
- Systematic and/or complete republication of the articles and content available on The Choice is prohibited.
- Republishing The Choice articles on a site whose access is entirely available by payment or by subscription is prohibited.
- For websites where access to digital content is restricted by a paywall, republication of The Choice articles, in their entirety, must be on the open access portion of those sites.
- The Choice reserves the right to enter into separate written agreements for the republication of its articles, under the non-exclusive Creative Commons licenses and with the permission of the authors. Please contact The Choice if you are interested at contact@the-choice.org.
Individual cases
Extracts: It is recommended that after republishing the first few lines or a paragraph of an article, you indicate "The entire article is available on ESCP’s media, The Choice" with a link to the article.
Citations: Citations of articles written by authors from The Choice should include a link to the URL of the authors’ article.
Translations: Translations may be considered modifications under The Choice's Creative Commons license, therefore these are not permitted without the approval of the article's author.
Modifications: Modifications are not permitted under the Creative Commons license of The Choice. However, authors may be contacted for authorization, prior to any publication, where a modification is planned. Without express consent, The Choice is not bound by any changes made to its content when republished.
Authorized connections / copyright assignment forms: Their use is not necessary as long as the republishing rules of this article are respected.
Print: The Choice articles can be republished according to the rules mentioned above, without the need to include the view counter and links in a printed version.
If you choose this option, please send an image of the republished article to The Choice team so that the author can review it.
Podcasts and videos: Videos and podcasts whose copyrights belong to The Choice are also under a Creative Commons license. Therefore, the same republishing rules apply to them.